Show simple item record

Brownian motion and multidimensional decision making

dc.contributorRalph, Daniel
dc.creatorLange, Rutger-Jan
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T13:11:30Z
dc.date.available2012-06-25T08:53:28Z
dc.date.available2018-11-24T13:11:30Z
dc.date.issued2012-05-08
dc.identifierhttp://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/243402
dc.identifierhttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/243402
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aust.edu.ng/xmlui/handle/123456789/2968
dc.description.abstractThis thesis consists of three self-contained parts, each with its own abstract, body, references and page numbering. Part I, "Potential theory, path integrals and the Laplacian of the indicator", finds the transition density of absorbed or reflected Brownian motion in a d-dimensional domain as a Feynman-Kac functional involving the Laplacian of the indicator, thereby relating the hitherto unrelated fields of classical potential theory and path integrals. Part II, "The problem of alternatives", considers parallel investment in alternative technologies or drugs developed over time, where there can be only one winner. Parallel investment accelerates the search for the winner, and increases the winner's expected performance, but is also costly. To determine which candidates show sufficient performance and/or promise, we find an integral equation for the boundary of the optimal continuation region. Part III, "Optimal support for renewable deployment", considers the role of government subsidies for renewable technologies. Rapidly diminishing subsidies are cheaper for taxpayers, but could prematurely kill otherwise successful technologies. By contrast, high subsidies are not only expensive but can also prop up uneconomical technologies. To analyse this trade-off we present a new model for technology learning that makes capacity expansion endogenous. There are two reasons for this standalone structure. First, the target readership is divergent. Part I concerns mathematical physics, Part II operations research, and Part III policy. Readers interested in specific parts can thus read these in isolation. Those interested in the thesis as a whole may prefer to read the three introductions first. Second, the separate parts are only partially interconnected. Each uses some theory from the preceding part, but not all of it; e.g. Part II uses only a subset of the theory from Part I. The quickest route to Part III is therefore not through the entirety of the preceding parts. Furthermore, those instances where results from previous parts are used are clearly indicated.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherUniversity of Cambridge
dc.publisherJudge Business School
dc.publisherKing's College
dc.publisherElectricity Policy Research Group (EPRG)
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales
dc.subjectClassical potential theory
dc.subjectBrownian motion
dc.subjectBoundary value problem
dc.subjectFree boundary problem
dc.subjectAbsorbed Brownian motion
dc.subjectReflected Brownian motion
dc.subjectDirichlet problem
dc.subjectNeumann problem
dc.subjectLaplacian of the indicator
dc.subjectProblem of alternatives
dc.subjectFirst passage decomposition
dc.subjectLast passage decomposition
dc.subjectOptimal stopping
dc.subjectSequential investment
dc.subjectMultidimensional optimal stopping (MOS)
dc.subjectFeed-in tariff
dc.subjectParallel investment
dc.subjectLearning-by-doing
dc.titleBrownian motion and multidimensional decision making
dc.typeThesis


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
PhD thesis RJL.pdf5.228Mbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record