Show simple item record

Proving Atomicity: An Assertional Approach

dc.date.accessioned2005-12-22T02:33:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T10:24:33Z
dc.date.available2005-12-22T02:33:34Z
dc.date.available2018-11-24T10:24:33Z
dc.date.issued2005-07-22
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/30559
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aust.edu.ng/xmlui/handle/1721.1/30559
dc.description.abstractAtomicity (or linearizability) is a commonly used consistency criterion for distributed services and objects. Although atomic object implementations are abundant, proving that algorithms achieve atomicity has turned out to be a challenging problem. In this paper, we initiate the study of systematic ways of verifying distributed implementations of atomic objects, beginning with read/write objects (registers). Our general approach is to replace the existing operational reasoning about events and partial orders with assertional reasoning about invariants and simulation relations. To this end, we define an abstract state machine that captures the atomicity property and prove correctness of the object implementations by establishing a simulation mapping between the implementation and the specification automata. We demonstrate the generality of our specification by showing that it is implemented by three different read/write register constructions (the message-passing register emulation of Attiya, Bar-Noy and Dolev, its optimized version based on real time, and the shared memory register construction of Vitanyi and Awerbuch), and by a general atomic object implementation based on the Lamport\'s replicated state machine algorithm.
dc.format.extent15 p.
dc.format.extent14829213 bytes
dc.format.extent699536 bytes
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleProving Atomicity: An Assertional Approach


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
MIT-CSAIL-TR-2005-048.pdf699.5Kbapplication/pdfView/Open
MIT-CSAIL-TR-2005-048.ps14.82Mbapplication/postscriptView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record