Show simple item record

Naive Problem Solving and Naive Mathematics

dc.date.accessioned2008-04-15T15:20:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T10:30:09Z
dc.date.available2008-04-15T15:20:18Z
dc.date.available2018-11-24T10:30:09Z
dc.date.issued1983-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/41194
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aust.edu.ng/xmlui/handle/1721.1/41194
dc.description.abstractAI problem solvers have almost always been given a complete and correct axiomatization of their problem domain and of the operators available to change it. Here I discuss a paradigm for problem solving in which the problem solver initially is given only a list of available operators, with no indication as to the structure of the world or the behavior of the operators. Thus, to begin it is "blind" and can only stagger about in the world tripping over things until it begins to understand what is going on. Eventually it will learn enough to solve problems in the world as well as if it the world had been explained to it initially. I call this paradigm naive problem solving. The difficulty of adequately formalizing all but the most constrained domains makes naive problem solving desirable. I have implemented a naive problem solver that learns to stack blocks and to use an elevator. It learns by finding instances of "naive mathematical cliches" which are common mental models that are likely to be useful in any domain.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherMIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen
dc.subjectnaive problem solvingen
dc.subjectnaice mathematicsen
dc.subjectproblem solving: planningen
dc.subjectproblem solving: semantic clichesen
dc.titleNaive Problem Solving and Naive Mathematicsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
AI_WP_249.pdf1.305Mbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record