A Counterexample to the Theory that Vision Recovers Three-Dimensional Scenes
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-04-28T14:47:12Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-26T22:25:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-04-28T14:47:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-26T22:25:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1988-11 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/41490 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.aust.edu.ng/xmlui/handle/1721.1/41490 | |
dc.description.abstract | The problem of three-dimensional vision is generally formulated as the problem of recovering the three-dimensional scene that caused the image. Here we present a certain line-drawing and show that it has the following property: the three-dimensional object we see when we look at this line-drawing does not have the line-drawing as its image. It would therefore be impossible for the seen object to be the cause of the image. Such an occurrence constitutes a counterexample to the theory that vision recovers the scene that caused the image. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory | en |
dc.title | A Counterexample to the Theory that Vision Recovers Three-Dimensional Scenes | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
AI_WP_319.pdf | 219.6Kb | application/pdf | View/ |