Show simple item record

The Incremental Rigidity Scheme for Recovering Structure from Motion: Position vs. Velocity Based Formulations

dc.date.accessioned2004-10-01T20:10:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T10:09:45Z
dc.date.available2004-10-01T20:10:45Z
dc.date.available2018-11-24T10:09:45Z
dc.date.issued1985-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5610
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aust.edu.ng/xmlui/handle/1721.1/5610
dc.description.abstractPerceptual studies suggest that the visual system uses the "rigidity" assumption to recover three dimensional structures from motion. Ullman (1984) recently proposed a computational scheme, the incremental rigidity scheme, which uses the rigidity assumptions to recover the structure of rigid and non-rigid objects in motion. The scheme assumes the input to be discrete positions of elements in motion, under orthographic projection. We present formulations of Ullmans' method that use velocity information and perspective projection in the recovery of structure. Theoretical and computer analyses show that the velocity based formulations provide a rough estimate of structure quickly, but are not robust over an extended time period. The stable long term recovery of structure requires disparate views of moving objects. Our analysis raises interesting questions regarding the recovery of structure from motion in the human visual system.en_US
dc.format.extent53 p.en_US
dc.format.extent7955028 bytes
dc.format.extent6307625 bytes
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectmotion analysisen_US
dc.subjectstructure from motionen_US
dc.subjectimage analysisen_US
dc.subject3-D analysisen_US
dc.subjectsvelocity fielden_US
dc.subjectrigidity assumption.en_US
dc.titleThe Incremental Rigidity Scheme for Recovering Structure from Motion: Position vs. Velocity Based Formulationsen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
AIM-845.pdf6.307Mbapplication/pdfView/Open
AIM-845.ps7.955Mbapplication/postscriptView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record