Show simple item record

Conservative Rationalizability and The Second-Knowledge Mechanism

dc.date.accessioned2010-12-30T09:30:03Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T22:26:29Z
dc.date.available2010-12-30T09:30:03Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T22:26:29Z
dc.date.issued2010-12-20
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/60371
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aust.edu.ng/xmlui/handle/1721.1/60371
dc.description.abstractIn mechanism design, the traditional way of modeling the players' incomplete information about their opponents is "assuming a Bayesian." This assumption, however, is very strong and does not hold in many real applications. Accordingly, we put forward (1) a set-theoretic way to model the knowledge that a player might have about his opponents, and (2) a new class of mechanisms capable of leveraging such more conservative knowledge in a robust way. In auctions of a single good, we show that such a new mechanism can perfectly guarantee a revenue benchmark (always lying in between the second highest and the highest valuation) that no classical mechanism can even approximate in any robust way.en_US
dc.format.extent23 p.en_US
dc.titleConservative Rationalizability and The Second-Knowledge Mechanismen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
MIT-CSAIL-TR-2010-060.pdf348.4Kbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record