Show simple item record

The Use of Censors for Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Analogy in Medical Desicion-Making

dc.date.accessioned2004-10-04T14:55:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T10:13:27Z
dc.date.available2004-10-04T14:55:41Z
dc.date.available2018-11-24T10:13:27Z
dc.date.issued1985-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6416
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aust.edu.ng/xmlui/handle/1721.1/6416
dc.description.abstractA patient rarely has a single, isolated disease. The situation is usually much more complex since the different parts of the human organism and metabolism interact with each other and follow several feedback patterns. These interactions and feedback patterns become more important with the addition of the external environment. When a disease is present, the first steps of the medical diagnosis should be to research and to determine whether another disease interacts with ("Censors") or changed the significant symptoms, syndromes, or results of the laboratory tests of the first disease. Understanding of this interaction and the appropriate reasoning is based on a type of non-monotonic logic. We will try, within this paper, to see the effect of two diseases on each other. One important part of the effect of two diseases on each other is the entrancing effect of what we call "Censors." In addition, causal reasoning, reasoning by analogy, and learning from precedents are important and necessary for a human-like expert in medicine. Some aspects of their application to thyroid diseases, with an implemented system, are considered in this paper.en_US
dc.format.extent5199219 bytes
dc.format.extent4078343 bytes
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleThe Use of Censors for Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Analogy in Medical Desicion-Makingen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
AIM-798.pdf4.078Mbapplication/pdfView/Open
AIM-798.ps5.199Mbapplication/postscriptView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record