Show simple item record

Theories of Comparative Analysis

dc.date.accessioned2004-10-20T20:02:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T10:22:07Z
dc.date.available2004-10-20T20:02:12Z
dc.date.available2018-11-24T10:22:07Z
dc.date.issued1988-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6846
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aust.edu.ng/xmlui/handle/1721.1/6846
dc.description.abstractComparative analysis is the problem of predicting how a system will react to perturbations in its parameters, and why. For example, comparative analysis could be asked to explain why the period of an oscillating spring/block system would increase if the mass of the block were larger. This thesis formalizes the task of comparative analysis and presents two solution techniques: differential qualitative (DQ) analysis and exaggeration. Both techniques solve many comparative analysis problems, providing explanations suitable for use by design systems, automated diagnosis, intelligent tutoring systems, and explanation based generalization. This thesis explains the theoretical basis for each technique, describes how they are implemented, and discusses the difference between the two. DQ analysis is sound; it never generates an incorrect answer to a comparative analysis question. Although exaggeration does occasionally produce misleading answers, it solves a larger class of problems than DQ analysis and frequently results in simpler explanations.en_US
dc.format.extent181 p.en_US
dc.format.extent22159466 bytes
dc.format.extent8248976 bytes
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectqualitative analysisen_US
dc.subjectcausal reasoningen_US
dc.subjectcomparativesanalysisen_US
dc.subjectDQ analysisen_US
dc.subjectexaggerationen_US
dc.titleTheories of Comparative Analysisen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
AITR-1035.pdf8.248Mbapplication/pdfView/Open
AITR-1035.ps22.15Mbapplication/postscriptView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record