Show simple item record

An Equivalence Between Sparse Approximation and Support Vector Machines

dc.date.accessioned2004-10-22T20:17:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T10:23:42Z
dc.date.available2004-10-22T20:17:52Z
dc.date.available2018-11-24T10:23:42Z
dc.date.issued1997-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7289
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.aust.edu.ng/xmlui/handle/1721.1/7289
dc.description.abstractIn the first part of this paper we show a similarity between the principle of Structural Risk Minimization Principle (SRM) (Vapnik, 1982) and the idea of Sparse Approximation, as defined in (Chen, Donoho and Saunders, 1995) and Olshausen and Field (1996). Then we focus on two specific (approximate) implementations of SRM and Sparse Approximation, which have been used to solve the problem of function approximation. For SRM we consider the Support Vector Machine technique proposed by V. Vapnik and his team at AT&T Bell Labs, and for Sparse Approximation we consider a modification of the Basis Pursuit De-Noising algorithm proposed by Chen, Donoho and Saunders (1995). We show that, under certain conditions, these two techniques are equivalent: they give the same solution and they require the solution of the same quadratic programming problem.en_US
dc.format.extent16 p.en_US
dc.format.extent305230 bytes
dc.format.extent497486 bytes
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectSupport Vector Machinesen_US
dc.subjectSparse Approximationen_US
dc.subjectSparse Codingen_US
dc.subjectReproducing Kernel Hilbert Spacesen_US
dc.titleAn Equivalence Between Sparse Approximation and Support Vector Machinesen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
AIM-1606.pdf497.4Kbapplication/pdfView/Open
AIM-1606.ps305.2Kbapplication/postscriptView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record